What is all this sudden talk about tracking or counting macros? Is it another one of those soon-to-be ill-fated diet fads? Why is it snappishly the go-to guide to losing weight and keeping fit?
Macro tracking has actually been around for a while. It’s what bodybuilders use for bulking up or cutting back. There’s a lot more to the process compared to just considering the amount of potential energy in food we consume versus the energy we use up.
Here are a few reasons why counting macros are better than counting calories.
The term “macros” is short for macronutrients. These consist of three types: carbohydrates, proteins, and fat. The usual daily allowance is divided as: 40% carbs, 40% protein, 20% fat, totaling to a hundred percent respectably. On another note, micronutrients are vitamins and minerals.
Counting calories usually involve one pre-set number that would go toward the individual’s goal.It’s more ‘big picture’ than anything. It is normally not specified which kind of nourishment to consume so long as the amount of calories is within the goal range. If the target is 1800 calories per day, for example, a person may just wolf down whatever. It could be a bunch of junk food or empty calories. If it falls on or under 1800 calories, then all is good.
With macros, the amount of each of the three nutrients is tweaked according to the person’s target, be it losing fat, adding muscle, or even shedding muscle weight. For example, an individual looking to lose fat and add muscle mass may bring up the usual 40% for protein and take from the allowances for carbs and fat. That is oversimplifying it, though. It can get complicated.
To expand on the former ideal, tracking macros require precise measurement of food. The allowance is converted to weight rather than volume, which is typical with calorie-counting.
Each food item majorly containing specific macronutrients must be weighed with a scale that’s accurate and precise to the gram every time. People who love to think ahead and prepare their own food at home would thrive in the world of macro-counting.
The by-the-numbers factor would ensure better results. Although some people still eyeball it when tracking macros. Results aren’t as pleasing, of course.
This is what puts a lot of people off counting their macros as it can be time consuming. That and the fact the unplanned meals or snacks are out of the question. So dining out is normally crossed out of the options once a person decides to go all-in with the method.
As mentioned, counting macros can be a task at first. But as with most repetitive activities, people would get used to it eventually. After a while, it would become second nature to budget macro allowances, and assess food packet labels to see the amount of specific macronutrients they have. This is as opposed to just looking at the caloric content per serving as a whole.
For that reason, the method can actually be educational in the sense that we can discover how much of a certain nutrient is there in the food that we eat every day before counting macros, like how much sugar there is in a single pomegranate fruit (it’s 39 whopping grams), or that most beers are packed with carbs.
Ultimately, most personal trainers and perhaps some nutrition specialists would recommend counting calories alongside tracking macros. The two are basically different styles compounded in one painting. Counting calories may be considered as the broad strokes while macros consideration is the fine details that work with the former to create a piece.
At the end of the day, resorting to one or the other, or even both, could just be the more effective approach once a person has worked out what is best for him or her. Getting help from a professional is always a good idea.
As far as getting a helping hand goes, ThinTea’s Detox and Fat Burn plans would be great for supplementing both techniques. Made from all-natural ingredients, these blends are formulated to give weight watchers the best possible results. ThinTea 14-day and 28-day plans are available at ThinTea.com.au.